UN Food Chief Denounces Cartels, Biofuels, and "20 Years of
Errors," Invokes the Right to Food
Olivier de Schutter, UN Special Rapporteur on the
Right to Food, in her concluding remarks to the Special Session
of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on May 22, characterized
the consensus of the event as three-fold: The right to food is a
fundamental human right; each nation has an obligation to provide
food for its people, while there is also an "international
obligation of all States towards all peoples of the world;" and
third, a point that is "often underestimated," is the role of
"large agricultural cooperatives--transnational corporations had
an immense power on the market and were dictating their prices to
small farmers."
De Schutter also insisted that the crisis was not simply one
of a "lack of purchasing power," but that there was a real supply
problem--that more food must be produced. "Emergency measures
were not enough," she said, demanding long term supply solutions.
She said we were "now paying for 20 years of errors."
De Schutter repeated her condemnation of biofuels, and
called for the revesal of the desertification of Sub-Saharan
Africa.
A Resolution passed by consensus also called for all
countries to send high level delegations to the June 3-5 FAO
conference, and for the Special Rapporteur to report back to the
Council on that FAO Conference.
Canada's representative Terry Cormier gave the British
perspective: They "regretted that the resolution placed the
primary responsibility on the international community and not on
the States themselves." They also regretted that there was no
"language on the need for all States to provide free and safe
access for humanitarian assistance," clearly referring to the
"responsibility to protect" argument that the West should invade
Myanmar and others who resist British demands. Nonetheless, said
Cormier, "aware of the importance of the resolution, Canada would
not block consensus on it." The British had a similar statement,
ranting about Burma.
Other comments of importance:
{{Russia:}} "It is not right that one-sixth of the world's
population did nmot have access to adequate food, when it was
possible to feed 12 bilion people, twice the number of the
present world population."
{{Bolivia:}} The Bretton Woods Institutions had placed "an
excessive focus on exports, weakening the role of small
producers," while the "sources of subsistence themselves had been
privatized--namely seeds."
{{Zambia:}} "If rising prices of food were not controlled,
the riots they had witnessed over the past few months were bound
to spread to other parts of the world."
{{Uraguay:}} "The world had to double its food production
by 2050 to avoid starvation."
{{Congo:}} "The current crisis was not the result of a
natural disaster. It was caused by policies, strategies and
activities carried out all over the world."
{{North-Xouth XXI (an NGO):}} "Adopting resolutions did
not add a single piece of bread to the mouths of the hungry.
Changes were needed in policies and programs, and, critically,
the policies of the World Bank and the IMF. They also needed to
re-examine the policies of unbridled free trade imposed by
countries of the north on countries of the south via the WTO."
|